National security adviser Michael Flynn resigned from his position earlier this week after it was discovered he had misled Vice President Michael Pence and other top White House officials about previous conversations he had had with Russia.
The Justice Department reportedly warned the White House that Flynn’s mischaracterization of his communication with Russian officials could possibly make them vulnerable to blackmail by Moscow.
Flynn’s resignation statement on Monday:
“In the course of my duties as the incoming National Security Advisor, I held numerous phone calls with foreign counterparts, ministers, and ambassadors. These calls were to facilitate a smooth transition and begin to build the necessary relationships between the President, his advisors and foreign leaders. Such calls are standard practice in any transition of this magnitude,” Flynn stated. “Unfortunately, because of the fast pace of events, I inadvertently briefed the Vice President Elect and others with incomplete information regarding my phone calls with the Russian Ambassador. I have sincerely apologized to the President and the Vice President, and they have accepted my apology,” he said.
Flynn had spoken with Russian ambassador Sergey Kisluak on December 29, which happens to align with when Barack Obama imposed sanctions on Russia, including the expulsion of 35 Russian officials for suspected interference with the United States election.
The next day Russia President Vladimir Putin responded to the sanctions voicing his disappointment in Obama’s decision, but refused to exacerbate the situation, declining to counter with sanctions on the U.S. and instead wished Obama and his family a happy new year.
The amiable response from Putin bewildered some within the Democratic party leading them to speculate as to what really transpired between Flynn and Russia.
U.S. intelligence agencies recorded Flynn’s conversations with Russia and reportedly discovered that Flynn had called Kisulak to urge Russia to not overreact to the sanctions being imposed by Obama and to review the matter once Trump was sworn in as President. The discovery contradicted Flynn’s account of having only communicated with Russia to offer his condolences for the shoot down of a Russian plane and other diplomatic matters irrelevant to the Russian sanctions.
The disturbing matter in all of this, is that U.S. intelligence agencies are barred from recording and releasing American conversations unless given written approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court, suggesting ulterior considerations were in operation.
Back in July of 2012, Gen. Flynn was appointed by Barack Obama to run his Defense Intelligence Agency, or the DIA, which is responsible for the handling of intelligence related to military weaponry.
Flynn and Obama never saw eye to eye on foreign affairs and military matters. Flynn was fired by Obama for “insubordination” after failing to follow the guidance from his superiors, including James Clapper, Obama’s CIA director. Flynn vehemently refuted this, claiming Obama fired him simply for having tougher views on Islamic terrorism than the rest of the Obama administration, and even accused Obama of preventing the “discrediting” of Radical Islam in the U.S.
So who was the culprit behind Flynn’s opprobrium?
Acting Attorney General Sally Yates informed the White House she believed Flynn was potentially vulnerable to blackmail from Russia. Yates considered Flynn’s comments in the intercepted call to be highly significant and potentially illegal.
The same Sally Yates who ordered Justice Department lawyers to not defend challenges to President Trumps temporary immigration ban shortly after its issuing, after citing she was unconvinced the order was legal.
Trump critic Bill Kristol tweeted after the Flynn resignation, “Obviously strongly prefer normal democratic and constitution politics. But if it comes to it, prefer the deep state to the Trump state.”
Trump’s administration was sabotaged, and Flynn was the scapegoat.
But why Flynn?
No one person in Washington D.C. saw through Obama’s facade more so than Flynn.
No one person in Washington D.C. observed Obama’s glaring deficiencies in addressing Islamic terrorism more so than Flynn.
No one person in Washington D.C. evoked more fear from the establishment than Flynn.
Flynn told the truth about Islam and Obama and the Democratic elites knew it.
The left had to purge Flynn from D.C. before it was too late, before Trump and company could save the United States.
This, was about the Muslim Ban.
Less than a month into Donald Trump’s Presidency, it can already be argued that we’ve gone from the most indecisive President in American history to the most decisive.
During his first ten days, Trump had already signed two proclamations, seven executive orders and seven presidential memoranda.
Just for some perspective, former President Barack Obama signed a total of 275 executive orders in his 2920 days in the Oval Office. That’s approximately an average of one executive order signed every ten days. Trump’s signed off on seven in his first ten days alone.
Of course it’s impossible to continue this pace, but Trump has quickly displayed an ability to follow through on many of his fundamental campaign issues.
Had he not, the mainstream media and liberal politicians would be informing the Republicans who backed Trump and his loyal supporters that they got “conned”.
Instead, Trump is now a senseless Tyrant exhibiting behavior that’s leaning dangerously close to a constitutional crisis.
They’re so enraged over Trump’s productivity with ideas and proposals which they morally reject, that they’ve turned his early results into fear filled propaganda.
Trump issued an executive order which blocks visa entries into the U.S. from Iraq, Iran, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Libya and Yemen, countries congress has identified as being “high risk”.
The executive order is consistent with Trump’s earlier pledge, to temporarily halt Muslims from terrorist heavy countries from entering the U.S. until we can implement a more safe and secure vetting process that ensures American’s safety first.
Trump accomplishing what most politicians fail to do, fulfilling one of their primary campaign promises, was greeted with outrage that teetered on hysteria.
Almost instantly, the hashtag #MuslimBan was trending number one on Twitter worldwide.
Protestors fled to the streets of Chicago, Boston, LA and even to the steps of the Supreme Court to display their disapproval of Trump’s decision and to show empathy towards the Muslim community.
Huffington Post writer, Wajahat Ali, tweeted in the immediate aftermath, “If you do support the #MuslimBan today, remember this: you will be remembered as the villains of our Children’s history books tomorrow.”
CNN informed their dwindling American audience the move sent “shockwaves” across the country. The NYT, Politico and Buzzfeed selectively chose the wording in their headlines, repeating “Muslims” and “Ban” in an attempt to control the narrative and distort reality.
Companies turned on each other, as Uber faced backlash for continuing its services while the New York Taxi Association imposed a work stoppage at the JFK Airport in retaliation to Trumps decision.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who’s policies are at direct odds with Trumps, tweeted shortly after the order was issued, “to those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength”, taking a not so subtle shot at Trumps refugee halt.
The order created unanimous outcry from seasoned Democratic politicians, a posture that was wholly calculated.
Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ.), tweeted his disapproval, “President Trump’s fundamentally un-American executive order today stands in painful contrast to our ideals”.
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY.) was even brought to tears by the order, calling it mean spirited and un-American. “This order goes against what we believe in America, the order will make us unsafe, the order will make us inhuman and the order will make us less of America”.
Elizabeth Warren echoed the thoughts of her fellow Democrats, vowing to fight Trump in the courts and in Congress, and went as far as to accuse Trump of acting above the laws of the United States.
In the midst of the outrage, scare tactics and fury that equated to the left’s self implosion in November, Trump continued to illustrate the stark contrast between his and Obama’s convictions.
While Democrats and social justice warriors everywhere applauded Yates for honoring her oath, the constitution and the law, Trump fired her for not following his orders.
Yates’ move reeked of moral grandstanding. The order was both constitutional and within the law under the Presidential provision, “The President has the capacity to suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens, as immigrants or non immigrants, on the basis of saying they’re detrimental to the interest of the United States”.
Under said provision, Trump has the legal and constitutional authority to suspend or halt the entry of all non immigrants and immigrants if he deems them a hindrance to our constitution and a threat to the best interests of the American people.
The pro Islam propaganda continued, articles scolding Trump for his decision to follow through on his “anti Muslim” campaign promises, CBS News even sharing an article declaring the Statue of Liberty had been initially intended to be that of a Muslim, an obvious piece of deception pointing to the importance of globalism and the acceptance of migration from all corners.
An Iraqi refugee in Michigan, claimed his mother had passed away as a result of Trumps temporary halt, when in fact, his mother had passed away five days before the order was even signed off on. Facts notwithstanding, the media pounced on the story because if fit their “Trump is an Islamaphobe” narrative.
Beyond all the left’s hysteria, lied a moderate executive order, and one that is consistent with Trumps foreign policy rhetoric.
It’s possible to be reasonable and produce fair criticisms towards Trump’s refugee halt, as there are components within the order and it’s delivery that warrant such criticism.
The left has become so accustomed to overstating and inflating any rhetoric or policy Trump produces however, that any sensible or credible reaction is unnatural and unsustainable.
The executive order itself is a temporary immigration halt that suspends all refugees from entering the U.S. for 120 days, Syrian refugees indefinitely, and bars the arrival of citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for at least 90 days.
The order temporarily withholds visas for 90 days from the seven aforementioned countries, all countries singled out by the Obama administration as potential threats to homeland security. Iran, Syria and Sudan are all listed as state sponsors of terrorism. Somalia has recently produced two terror attacks on U.S. soil, Iraq set a record for international terrorism just two years ago, Libya has become the most dangerous region in all the Middle East since the death of Moammar Gadhafi, and Yemen perhaps provides the largest Jihadist threat of all to America.
Articles arose from Vox, Huffington Post, and Slate, objecting to the countries listed by Trump, using the beyond flawed logic that since the attacks which occurred on U.S. soil did not stem from the seven countries appearing on the 90 day ban, Trump’s executive order won’t stop terrorism. This gross oversimplification of the situation illustrates the fundamental misunderstanding of the situation from the leftists eager to attribute all rationale behind the policy, to Trump’s desire to put his Islamaphobia into practice, not to mention it’s factually incorrect.
This is not a Muslim Ban in any respect, nor is it an extreme proposal. The order addresses those who may bear hostile attitudes towards our country and it’s founding principles. It doesn’t target any particular race, region, nor religion.
Trump’s order doesn’t mention the word Muslim once.
The order doesn’t remotely affect 87 percent of the entire Muslim population. It doesn’t apply to 9 of the 10 most Muslim populated countries in the world.
This ban prevents approximately 1 out of every 8 Muslims from entering the United States for 90 days. Just for perspective, this will affect 13 pct of the entire Muslim world population for 1/314.8 of their lives.
It’s completely temporary, as the order declared the U.S. will still be accepting a total of 50,000 total refugees in 2017, a number that’s consistent with the total Obama was willing to take on just a few short years ago.
It’s also a far more modest order than the mainstream media is letting on, and it’s similar to courses of action politicians from both sides of the aisle have participated in before.
In 1980, former President Jimmy Carter banned Iranian immigrants from entry into the United States, unless it could be proven they opposed the Shite Islamist regime. This was an extremely strict ban on Iranian visa holders, and was issued in response to the Iran hostage crisis where more than 60 American embassy personnel were held captive in Tehran. Carter also boldly signed an executive order forcing 50,000 Iranian students living in the U.S. to report to an immigration office, many of whom were eventually deported.
The man Trump just replaced, banned refugees from Iraq from entering the United States for six months in 2011. The move was made in response to the discovery of two Iraqi al-Qeada linked operatives living as refugees in Kentucky. Obama, to his credit, delivered his executive order in a more muted manner, but this doesn’t change the reality of it’s intended impact.
After the 9/11 tragedy, Democratic House members and Senators still serving today helped get the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act passed in Congress.
The Act was put into place to restrict non immigrant visas from countries designated as state sponsors of terror. In the bill, it states “no non immigrant visa shall be issued to any alien from a country that is a state sponsor of international terrorism unless the Secretary of State determines, in consultation with the Attorney General and the heads of the other appropriate United States agencies, that such alien does not pose a threat to the safety of national security of the United States”.
The bill was passed and supported by 16 Democratic senators and 57 Democratic House Members serving today. The quoted portion of the bill reads eerily similar to the executive order these same Democrats are appalled by now. Context is important, as the terror landscape in America was vastly different in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks, but this is indisputable evidence U.S. politicians are willing to deny visa holders entry if they perceive them as a detriment to the safety of the American people, the same rationale the man they’re currently scolding is using.
As for the order itself, it addresses multiple foreign affairs matters the Obama administration failed to sufficiently account for. The order also illustrates the different lens with which the two view the world.
All refugees are banned from entry into the U.S. for 120 days, giving the Secretary of State, Secretary of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence 30 days to determine the standard necessary for visa entry into the U.S.
Under the order, The Secretary of State is to prioritize based on religious based persecution for the refugees. The refugee has to prove the religion he/she is practicing is a minority religion within that persons country.
Obamas treatment of Syrian Christian refugees was deplorable, especially in the past fiscal year. Obama admitted over 12,000 Muslim refugees from Syria in 2016, while accepting less than 100 Christian refugees. Syrian Christian refugees made up for 0.0054 percent of all Syrian refugees accepted into the United States in 2016. This is a country that is 90 percent Muslim and only 10 percent Christian.
This is a beyond disturbing figure, and forces one to question Obama’s motives. While the mainstream media and liberals throughout the country attempt to label Trump’s order as a “Muslim Ban”, they conveniently ignored Obama’s indisputable Christian Ban.
The United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees or the UNCHR, is a refugee rehabilitation agency in which many of the refugees who end up in the U.S. are steered through. The agency is also known for its collaborative anti Israeli rhetoric on behalf of the Palestines. The depraved irony in all of this, is that 16 Muslim countries currently ban Israeli Jews from entering their country today. Six of the sixteen countries are on Trump’s 90 day ban list. Apparently the UNCHR sole mission is to safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees, unless you’re an Israeli Jew. While the left continues to falsely label Trump’s order a ban, they hypocritically disregard the actual ban and cruel treatment imposed by the religion they mindlessly shield.
Trump cites the September 11 tragedy as an example of our Visa system failing to protect the American people.
It’s far too broad of a brush, but it’s really meant to apply to Obamas failures in preventing radical Islamic terrorism from occurring on our own home turf despite his many claims to the contrary.
Since Obama took over as President in 2009, there have been approximately 14 radical Islamic terror attacks successfully planned and executed on U.S. soil. Over one third of which have occurred since last June, when Omar Mateen shot and killed 49 people at Pulse nightclub in Orlando, FL.
This past September in St. Cloud, Minnesota, Dahir Ahmed Adan, stabbed and injured 9 people while shouting “Islam, Islam” and “Allahu Akbar” before being shot dead. Adan, a 20 yr old Somalian refugee, asked his potential victims if they were Muslim before hacking them.
On November 28, 2016, Ohio State student and 20 year old Somalian refugee Abdul Razak Ali Artan, tried to run over his fellow students with his car before crashing into a barrier. Artan then jumped out and started stabbing those in closest proximity, injuring a total of 11. ISIS took credit for the attack and Artan warned more lone wolf attacks would soon be coming to the United States.
12 of the total 14 terror attacks to occur on U.S. soil, have taken place since Obamas second term in office, 11 of which have occurred since September of 2014, with 5 occurring in the last 8 months alone. There were zero confirmed attacks in 2010, 2011, 2012 before the Boston Bombing on April 15, 2013. Since then there have been eleven.
The oversights committed by federal intelligence leading to terror attacks of deadly consequence didn’t go unnoticed by the new administration either.
On January 6, 2016 Iraq war veteran Esteban Luiz Santiago walked through the Fort Lauderdale Airport, before shooting and killing five Airport attendees in cold blood. In the aftermath of the attack, Santiago Ruiz confessed to be fighting for ISIS.
Less than two months before the attack, Santiago voluntarily walked into his local Anchorage FBI field office to inform the agency he was being forced to watch ISIS videos. Santiago appeared incoherent and disturbed, but because he said he did not want to inflict harm on anyone, the FBI took him for his word and assigned the case to the local authorities, who then sent him to a mental facility for evaluation before being released shortly there after. Santiago created a jihadist identity under the name Aashiq Hammed, and had downloaded Islamic music three years before he was deployed to Iraq. Santiago was also posting on a explosives/weapons forum concerning the mass-downloading of Islamic terrorist propaganda videos in 2007.
Santiagos situation magnifies an underlying issue within the federal agency departments protocol for terror related concerns. Even Santiago’s brother described him as a walking time bomb and believes the incident wouldn’t have occurred had the FBI stepped up and used common sense. “The federal government already knew about this for months” Santiago’s brother Bryan stated, “they had been evaluating him for a while but they didn’t do anything”.
In 2012, Obama deputies released the “FBI Guiding Principles: Touchstone Document on Training.” In the guidelines, lay a set of extremely restrictive rules to which the FBI must adhere when investigating potential terror threats. Within the guidelines it states:
“Extremist speech is rarely consequential enough for an investigation, a suspects mere association with organizations that demonstrate advocacy and violent extremism should not automatically result in a determination that individual is acting in that organizations illicit objectives and investigators must focus on behavioral indicators that have a potential nexus to terrorist or criminal activity, while making it clear religious expression and the espousing of political ideologies are constitutionally protected activities that must not be equated with terrorism absent other indication of such offenses”
The measures imposed by Obama assisted Omar Mateen in killing 49 victims at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, FL. Mateen was investigated by the FBI on two separate occasions before committing his massacre, but the restrictive parameters prevented the FBI from extensively acting on Mateens affiliation with a radical mosque network, due to his right to exercise his religion.
On December 2, 2015, 14 people were killed and another 22 were injured in a terrorist attack mass shooting in San Bernardino, California. Married couple Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, carried out the attack at a company Christmas party event. The two were part of an investigation the Obama administration previously disrupted. The officials reportedly deleted 67 critical documents that were thought to be part of a Muslim terror network, which connected through affiliated U.S. mosques to headquarters in India.
Farook was a U.S. citizen of Pakistani descent and his wife Malik, was a jihadist who migrated from Pakistan. Had the Obama administration not deleted the documents, Farook would have ultimately been placed on the no fly zone list which would have prevented him from flying to Pakistan and getting his wife Malik a visa.
Obama didn’t only impose restrictions on the FBI that made precise terror investigations a near impossibility, he actively implemented measurements to protect the Muslim religion. Trump would abolish these multicultural-friendly criteria from the FBI, enabling them to thoroughly inspect all terror suspects living on U.S. soil.
“We Won’t Become Them”
Paris, Brussels, Istanbul, Berlin, all western cities devastated by radical Islamic terrorism. Western countries willingly relinquishing prosperity all in the name of inclusion, a doctrine Obama’s foreign policy paralleled.
Salah Abdeselam, a Belgium born French national of Moroccan decent, exposed the ineptitude of the Western open border tenet unaided. Abdeslam picked up a group of extremists posing as “refugees” in Hungary, who had just arrived from Syria during the peak of the European migrant crisis. Abdeslam drove the extremists to Western Europe, six of whom participated in the Paris Attacks in November which left 137 dead and another 368 wounded. After participating in the Paris attack, Abdeslam fled to Brussels where he was aided and embedded by local Muslims. Four of the others he had driven to Western Europe, participated in the Brussels attack later that March, resulting in 35 deaths and 300 injuries. That’s 172 deaths all in the name of inclusion and open borders.
Tunisian born Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhel, drove his truck into crowds during Bastille Day in Nice, France less than 8 months after the Paris tragedies shook the same nation. Families and friends walked the boardwalk, innocently wandering and celebrating before Bouhel plowed into the crowds of people, many of whom didn’t see it coming due to loud music and fireworks exploding within the area. Bouhel, who pledged alliance to ISIS, struck and killed 84 people, many of whom were young children. Hillary Clinton elected to respond to the tragedy by tweeting, “Lets be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”
It’s true that Islam is not our adversary, after all, this is no Muslim ban. There is however, a clear pattern of mass radical terror attacks taking place in Western countries who are cultivating multiculturalism.
What’s more palpable, is the liberal politicians and globalist leaders calculated incompetence concerning the foundation for these atrocities. Is it likely that Hillary Clinton, who’s been a public servant for three decades, voted in favor of the Iraq war and has an abundance of experience in dealing with terrorism, has suddenly forgotten the root cause of radical terrorism-or- is it more likely, she’s subscribing to the leftist ideology of globalism, nurturing the Muslim population at the expense of the well being of those she is supposed to protect?
To defeat, one must acknowledge existence. I don’t particularly endorse Trump’s method of shouting radical Islamic terrorism from the mountain top, but it markedly surpasses the left’s conscious rejection of reality.
Islam and terrorism are not synonymous, as peaceful Muslims exist throughout the world. Timothy McVeigh, a white non-Muslim, carried out the Oklahoma City Bombing in April of 1995 to exact revenge for his disdain towards the U.S. government, killing 168 innocent people. Seung Hui Cho, a South Korean American, senselessly shot and killed 32 people on Virginia Techs campus in April of 2007 due to a suspected mental illness. Evil is a colorblind idionsyncrasy which fails to appertain to a singular orthodoxy.
Sects within the Islam religion however-sharia worshipping Muslims and Jihadists, indoctrinate extreme ideologies and draconian laws that threaten the sovereignty and welfare of America.
Not all Muslims are terrorists, but a staggering percentage of terrorists are Muslim. Muslim Americans are 5,000 times more likely to commit a terrorist attack than non Muslims, 450 out of 452 suicide attacks in 2015 were committed by Muslim extremists and in the last two years alone, Turkey has suffered seven Islamic terrorist attacks deadlier than the deadliest mass shootings in American history outside of Omar Mateen. U.S. ally France, has endured two radical Islamic terror attacks accounting for more fatalities, than the ten deadliest mass shooting sprees in American history combined, all of which have occurred in the last 15 months. Liberals like to deflect from Muslim related attacks by pointing to mass shootings committed by white Americans, but since 2009, 3 of the 4 deadliest mass shootings in America have occurred at the hands of radical Muslims.
To refuse this, is to ignore reality.
Turkey, the nation with the highest number of Muslim refugees, recently suffered another tragic terror attack on New Year’s Eve, when 39 people were shot and killed inside of the socially prominent Reina nightclub. The attack shocked the nation, as Islamic extremists targeted upper-middle class locals, shifting the dynamic in Turkey from the PKK targeting security forces, to the Jihadis sneaking into urban areas of the country. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish President since 2014, (which happens to align with the period in which Radical Islamic terror attacks started intensifying), stated, “pressuring Muslims to assimilate in their new western countries is a crime against humanity”.
In Germany, an ISIS “solider”, Anis Amri drove a truck into a crowded Christmas market in Berlin weeks before Christmas. The terrorist mowed down 12 and injured another 42, capping off the worst two year period of terrorist brutality in Germany since the 1980’s. Amri came to Germany in 2015 as an Asylum seeker from Tunisia as a result of Merkel’s open border policy. Germany has become a hotbed for ISIS, due to Merkel’s insistence on accepting one million refugees since 2015, a policy which is currently overwhelming German domestic intelligence. Merkel’s response to the tragedy, it’s Germany’s “firm determination to counter the terrorists hate with our humanity and our solidarity,” underlines a troubling pattern.
During a town hall earlier in the year, Gold Star mother Tina Houchins asked Obama about his refusal to link Islam to terrorism. Obama responded, “there’s no religious rationale that would justify in any way any of the things they do. But what I’ve been careful about when I describe these issues is to make sure that we do not lump these murderers into the billion Muslims that exist around the world, including in this country.”
Obama’s pablum of political correctness in protecting Muslims, echoing the sentiments of our closest ally’s. A self righteous virtue signaling complex, obscuring indoctrinated beliefs espousing of violent ideologies within sects of the Islamic religion. Vying to strip of us our guns, implement more gun free zones, preach open mindedness and tolerance, and that “love Trumps hate”, all while wittingly omitting the origin of it all.
He’s correct in his assertion that these acts of violence aren’t rational, for there’s nothing rational about sacrificing oneself in the name of “Alah”, or driving trucks into crowds of people, or beheading priests while shouting “Allahu Akbar”, but it’s an impossibility to view these acts in a pragmatic manner from the lens of an American. What can be seen from my lens, is a distinct correlation between western countries embracing mass Muslim immigration at a rapid rate, all in the name of empathy, believing their words can change these already deeply ingrained ideologies, and the intensifying of radical Islamic terrorist attacks in these nations.
“The United States cannot and should not, admit those who don’t support the constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law. In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage of acts of bigotry or hatred (including “honor killings”, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own) or those who would oppress Americans of any race, gender, or sexual orientation.”
Trumps direct reference to those who engage in violence towards women or oppress one based on sexual orientation speaks volumes.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel views immigration far differently than Trump. In addition to providing jihadists a breeding ground with her globalist open border philosophy, Merkel has endangered her female natives due to her unrelenting belief in the potential for multiculturalism. The over 1 million refugees Merkel has welcomed since 2015, have been mostly male asylum seekers from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Germany currently has the most Muslim refugees in all of Europe with over 4.7 million.
In July of 2016, after allowing over 60,000 refugees in from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and North Africa, hundreds of German women and children were sexually assaulted by migrants. The assault victims ranged from age 9 to 79, and victims were most often attacked in popular public places.
On New Year’s Eve of 2015, local Germans were celebrating the end of a year in Cologne, Hamburg and Hanover. What was intended to be an evening of harmless celebration, quickly escalated into a night shock and horror. Women throughout Germany discovered the frightful ramifications of Merkels all-inclusive practices in the most unspeakable of fashion. Over 1,200 women were sexually assaulted, a number German police initially claimed was as minimal as 300. A leaked document found the majority of sex crimes were committed in Cologne and Hamburg, where 600 and 400 assaults took place, but only four of the offenders were convicted. The chief prosecutor admitted the “overwhelming majority” of suspects were asylum seekers from Syria and North Africa and that, “There is a connection between the emergence of this phenomenon and the rapid migration in 2015.”
Fast forward 365 days, German security and local police forces were on high alert in an attempt to prevent the same horror from repeating. A group of Muslim/Arab men threw firecrackers into a section of close to 1,000 people to confuse, grope and sexually assault the women within the area. The majority of the attackers were once again freshly arrived asylum seekers from Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, a fact the Cologne police department attempted to cover up.
Germany’s police departments have reached levels of political correctness that have made them so lenient when it comes to prosecuting, sentencing and deporting refugee offenders, that 90 pct of sex crimes in Germany do not appear in their official statistics. Authorities in the German state of Hesse, suppressed information about migrant related crimes due to a “lack of public interest”. The police department in North-Rhine Westphalia was pressured by the Federal Anti Discrimination Agency to remove reference to “North African criminal groups”. According to Die Welt, a well known German publication, “the suppression of data about migrant criminality is a Germany-wide phenomenon.”
In Rotherham, England, over 1400 girls have been raped by Pakistani rape gangs. The local U.K. police failed to properly investigate the crimes due to fear of being labeled xenophobic and racist. Recent police data revealed that in the Norwegian capital of Oslo, 100 percent of assault rapes involving strangers, were committed by immigrant non-western males, and 9 in 10 victims were Norwegian women.
In Sweden, which many in Europe refer to as the “rape capital of the world”, police were banned from mentioning the ethnicity of rape suspects in their police reports. Sweden accepts more refugees in proportion to the size of its population than any other nation in the developed world. This past year over 163,000 asylum seekers crossed over, the majority of which came from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. As a result, Swedish police are advising the local women to change their behavior at night. Sweden has the second most rapes in the world and a rape rate that is six times higher than that of the U.S. and a recent study found on average, 1 in every 4 Swedish women are raped.
The most disturbing aspect in all of this, has been the police department and local medias deliberate effort to not report offenses, for fear of fueling an anti Muslim immigrant narrative, a pattern of actively silencing the truth at the expense of the best interests of the natives these globalist leaders are supposed to protect, a pattern of political correctness that mirrors Obama’s distortion of reality, something Trump wants to avoid at all costs.
Within the sects of Islam, lies Sharia law. Just as it’s true not all Muslims are jihadist terrorists, not all Muslims who don’t pose an obvious threat are innocuous either. While jihadists pose a real threat to American safety, it is the ideology residing in the often unassuming Sharia practicing Muslims that present the most profound threat to the welfare of the American people.
Sharia is the Islamic constitution and refers to the ethical principles set down in Islam’s Quran. In Qur’an -Surah 4:34 it states, if a man fears disloyalty from one of his wives: 1. He verbally admonishes her. 2. He does not share his bed with her. 3. He beats her. In Al-bukhari, 3241; Islam 2737, it states, “I looked into hell and saw that the majority of its people are women.” The witness of a woman in Sharia court is half that of a mans. A woman must have sex whenever her husband demands it and she may not go out in public without his permission. Men are permitted to sexually assault women if they’re not Islamic, for if they’re not Islamic, they’re not considered a citizen and lose their authority. One is not to leave the religion as such a decision is illegal and punishable by death. Those who perform homosexual acts shall be stoned to death.
This is the foundation which breeds behaviorism that not only morally conflicts with our values and principles, but wholly compromises the welfare of the American people. A framework that is willingly hostile towards non believers, gays and females, a constitution steering religion to impose totalitarianism and influence, and a religion in which one is not permitted to leave. A holy book in which Muslims are permitted to lie to non believers and encourages advances on non muslim females.
The oppression of women and fervent persecution of homosexuality taught throughout the Quran is so profound and regressive to our cultural morals and beliefs, accepting those from countries strongly tied to Sharia is an unequivocal danger to our sovereignty and prosperity. The globalist sentiment championed by these western leaders echoes Obama’s pablum of political correctness, at the expense of the well being of the women and LGBT community it is ordered to protect.
An assimilation resistant subset of an ideology recalcitrant to the self-governing principles in which American prosperity breeds. One in which solidarity, inclusion and good intentions eternally fail to hinder antithetical principles and values. An assemblage of immigrants migrating to western countries embracing an already deeply rooted belief system they deem superior to the one to which they’re migrating.
France currently has the second highest number of Muslim immigrants in all of Europe. The narrative engineered by the western media and liberal politicians is that mass Muslim assimilation has failed, not due to the incompatible cultural differences between Muslims and westerners or because of their desire for Sharia law to reign supreme, but rather the hostility visited upon Muslims from the intolerant west.
In early October of 2016, four French police officers were severely injured after being petrol bombed during a routine surveillance call in South Paris. The officers were parked, before a mob of some 15 men threw Molotov cocktails at the police car, an incident which sparked outrage throughout Paris and generated dialogue about police safety in France, to which the the French Prime Minster, Bernard Cazeeneueve responded, “no go zones” do not exist.
Cazeneueve’s duplicitous repudiation dismissive of the daunting hurdles his police officers endure on a daily basis, epitomizes the disconnect between these western globalist leaders preaching multiculturalism and their citizens who have to actually abide by it. As it turns out, over 750 “no go zones” exist throughout France, Muslim dominated enclaves littered with crime that French Law Enforcement have deemed too dangerous to enter. French neighborhoods seething with hostility towards all non believers, and those perceived to be flaunting anything resembling that of the western lifestyle. Separate societies independent of the laws of the country in which they inhibit.
There are currently over 55 “no go zones” in Sweden, a country which proclaims itself as the “humanitarian superpower of the world.” A country known for its compassion to a fault, the locals of Sweden who were once eager to arrange meals and provide clothing for those seeking refuge, have since altered that sentiment markedly, since the influx of refugees from Somalia, Afghanistan and Syria have wreaked havoc on their community.
In February, an Australian 60 Minutes crew flew to Sweden to report on the surge in African migrants and the effect the influx was having on the locals. As soon as the crew showed up on location, a group of Somalian men threatened the Aussies before running over one of the cameramen with their car. The crew then approached local police officers who admitted they were fearful their presence would only incite more violence. Later, while filming in a Stockholm suburb known as “Little Mogadishu”, the crew was once again assaulted by a group of masked refugees hurling bricks. The masked men then charged the crew demanding that they leave, before one of the refugees could be seen in the background attacking a local elder, pushing his wheelchair into a wall in one of the most barbaric acts i’ve witnessed.
In the U.K. women are routinely harassed for not covering themselves, as the refugees expect the western women to adapt to their way of life. In Germany, the local Christians are subjected to daily persecution from the Muslim migrants who loathe the religion in which they practice.
It’s plausible to ascribe such antagonism and hostility to the contradicting values and cultural norms the migrants and inhibits subscribe to, for they are in stark contrast and make mass assimilation a futile exercise. This solely, is a consequential detriment to the welfare of the American people, however a facile explanation.
This is the result of leftist leaders putting multiculturalism ahead of the welfare of their own, a clash of antithetical cultures incapable of unifying no matter how empathetic said national may be. A sect within a theology, hidden under the facade of a religion, to impose its totalitarian political ideology; A malicious quest to conquer the land in which it migrates to. Leaders spawning a society riddled with animosity and resentment from within, where refugees sequester to their own refuge, shielding them from authority enabling endless incitement and hostile behavior towards those they’re ordered to protect.
Sharia influences its worshippers to migrate west to intentionally resist assimilation, not to seek a more prosperous life, but to subject those they deem the enemy to Sharia law. To infiltrate the poor neighborhoods, the government, while lobbying for the implementation of Sharia, which gradually intensifies to pressuring said society through intimidation, a sense of torment and anguish locals in western nations are subjected to on a daily basis. A call to destroy western civilization from within.
Their ideology towards homosexuality also strongly conflicts with the progress we’ve made as a nation regarding LGBT rights. Just for perspective, same-sex acts are punishable by death today, in four of the seven countries banned from entry into the U.S., Somalia, Yemen, Iran and Iraq.
In a Gallup poll where 1,001 UK Muslims were asked for their feelings towards homosexuality, not one respondent said homosexuality was morally acceptable. Over half of those respondents, believe it should be criminalized as well. This is a startling statistic from the lens of a westerner.
In a poll conducted by Pew Research, in which Muslims were asked about homosexual behavior, over 75 pct said homosexuality is wrong in 33 of the 36 countries where the question was asked. Less than 6 pct of Muslims found homosexuality moral in 33 of the 36 countries asked.
The Leftist media habitually deflects from the disturbing intense homophobic beliefs possessed by these Sharia communities, by shifting the rhetoric back to Christians, asserting they too traditionally hold beliefs that are counter to the LGBT community’s best interests.
While it’s true the Bible calls homosexuality a sin, that’s where the semblance ends. Catholics and Christians who still hold the belief that homosexuality is a sin, hold sincere sympathy and compassion towards those they believe are “sinning”. Christians are instructed to love the sinner and to pray for the sin, and to love all, even those committing the sin. Those who are against gay marriage, simply not ask to be forced to personally agree to it. Christianity has an unfortunate history with homosexuality, but that can be said for all religions. Catholics and Christians have also adapted to the idea of homosexuality considerably of late, as the majority of Christians believe homosexuality should be accepted by society, a sentiment with which over 70 percent of Catholics agree.
That’s a stark contrast to a religion that indoctrinates homosexuality as a vile form of fornication punishable by death. Where 10 Sharia dominated countries punish homosexuality by death to this day. A religion that is actively hostile and antithetical towards homosexuals, entrapping those who happen to be gay into endless persecution.
On June 12, 2016, 320 people were joyfully dancing before the bars last call as it was closing in on 2 A.M. It was just like any other weekend night, when suddenly club goers were rushing out into the streets, some covering bloody wounds, others shouting for help, and unfortunate club attendees trapped inside, clinging only to hope. Omar Mateen was holding an AR assault rifle firing shots at anyone within close proximity. The end result was the deadliest mass shooting in American history, as 50 people total were killed and another 53 were injured. Only two mass shootings in American history had even killed half as many as Mateen slayed that deadly evening in Orlando.
Mateen slipped through the cracks, as he was investigated by the FBI on two separate occasions and was still able to purchase an assault rifle days before the massacre, illustrating just one of many intelligence failures under Obama. Mateen was born in New York to Afghani parents, an anti gay nation where same sex acts are punishable by death and Mateen’s family practiced sharia law. Similar to what the German media does, the mainstream media was deliberately slow coming forth with information.
It was reported that Mateen was spotted on more than a dozen occasions at Pulse nightclub. His ex-wife, who he physically assaulted on numerous occasions, suspected the he was a self loathing closeted gay man. His father reportedly called him gay several times and posted a bizarre one minute video in the aftermath of the shooting, declaring what a good son Mateen was, and that “The issue of homosexuality, the punishment-whatever they do, god punishes it.”
This brutal massacre was either the result of a man oppressed by his own family and religion because of his sexuality, or a hate crime against the LGBT community stemming from deep rooted beliefs instilled to him by his Sharia worshipping father, or more likely, both. Mateen not only had his family and culture reject his lifestyle, but his religion actively called for the killing of his own kind, a religion he could not leave.
What Mateen did was detestable, but the underlying cause for why the tragedy took place is a tragedy within itself.
The most disconcerting element of the Orlando massacre was how preventable it all was. Not because Mateen attended radical mosques which Obama’s strict guidelines prohibited the FBI from thoroughly looking into, although this was a crucial factor. It was what caused it, the underlying factor that has fostered environments of multiculturalism to the detriment of the best interests of the people in Germany, the U.K, France and Sweden. It’s why Sweden currently prohibits authorities from reporting the ethnicity of sexual assault offenders, and why Angela Merkel spoke of embracing each other in the aftermath of the Berlin massacre. It’s why French Mayor, Robert Menard, is currently set to be tried on hate charges for being transparent about France’s muslim immigration problem.
It was reported that Mateen’s former coworker Daniel Gilroy, reported his hostile and homophobic workplace rhetoric on multiple occasions to his employer. After being dismissed for voicing his concerns, he took it to the human resource department, to which they silenced his complaints, citing, “we have to be careful because he’s Muslim.”
Mateen’s organization was more fixated on potentially appearing racist and xenophobic, than they were with confronting troubling signs, a measure which could have prevented the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history and by extension, publicized the dark side of the religion the left religiously protects. A decision formulated by a culture plagued by political correctness, fostered by Obama’s intellectually dishonest rhetoric regarding it’s threat to the people, and mirroring the actions of those west, a region Americans routinely dismiss, declaring “we won’t become them.”
The biggest tragedy in all of this, are the Muslims which have become a victim of their own religion. The courageous Islamic reformers who embrace the constitution and its principles, the assimilated westernized middle class Muslims whom many of us grew up with and the peaceful Muslims resigned to silence.
The masking of the dangerous subset within the religion hurts them. We’re in this with you. Trump’s order protects you. Masking the dangerous ideological subset within your religion hurts you. You are the biggest victims.
We need to stop listening to the liberal politicians who constantly remind us that, “not all Muslims are represented by the actions of a few”, who are all too comfortable in labeling all those who point to the problems in Sweden and Germany as “xenophobic and racist”, to Keith Ellison and members of the Muslim brotherhood who lie about Sharia and routinely downplay it’s conflicting ideology with America. It’s telling that Keith Ellison demands apologies whenever Trump tells the truth about his perilous ideology.
This is precisely the environment these Sharia worshippers desire, a culture in which one is not to question, where Muslim apologists are aplenty, and the truth is evaded. Their bullying tactic in labeling Islamaphobe to anyone who dare question their dangerous ideology is an effective practice. Is it likely however, that all those questioning the inhuman ideology residing within Sharia, are racists espousing hate simply because they practice a religion that differs from their own, or, is it more likely, ones religion and race is incidental to said dangerous ideology, and that those hurling the unfounded accusations are resorting to baseless counter character attacks to elude the grim reality of their perilous ideology, one they can’t faithfully refute.
This past year, Obama admitted the highest number of Muslim refugees in American history. With that of course, comes potential consequences. Obama didn’t only discriminate against Syrian Christians, but openly embraced refugees from monolithic regions of the world with extreme ideological views.
Obama accepted 9,020 asylum seekers from Somalia in 2016, a country that’s produced two radical Islamic terror attacks in the last six months alone. Sharia is the law of the land in Somalia, a reality the citizenry of Minnesota are confronting presently. The Cedar Riverside section of Minneapolis has become an Islamic terror recruitment nest, as many Somalian refugees have left for Al-Shabab, while others have opted for ISIS in Syria and Turkey. Minnesota Attorney Andrew Luger admitted, “we have a terror recruitment problem in Minnesota”.
Obama welcomed nearly 10,000 Iraqi refugees this past year as well. This is a nation that supports Sharia law, as 91 pct are in favor of making it the official law of their land. Of course it’s possible a portion of these refugees were escaping persecution and hardship for being homosexual or practicing a minority religion, but this would be minimal at best. It is probable we migrated 9,100 Refugees that are incapable of coexisting with the American people, due to the religious cultural norms they subscribe to.
This puts the American people in a potentially very vulnerable position, even though it’s the President’s duty to protect the best interests of his own. Obama admitted a disconcerting number of refugees from Sharia nations during his second term, a trend which would have dramatically worsened under Clinton, ensuring the U.S. would have become the next Germany, France and Sweden.
This is not the ban of a religion, but rather the rejection of a perilous ideology that bears hostile attitudes towards our constitution and the American people.
It’s about revamping a vetting process and visa system which was irrefutably compromised and insufficient under Obama’s watch to the detriment of the American people, something General Flynn saw firsthand.
It’s about restoring order from the past administration, putting the American people’s best interest first and making a profound statement that the United States will not subscribe to the globalist ideology moving forward. It illustrates Trump’s innate ability to understand the pulse of the country that gravitated towards him in November, and the astute foresight he possesses in instituting measures that preclude the American people from experiencing the same harrowing ordeal many in the West are currently enduring.
Trump knowingly subjected himself to mass criticism and unrelenting opposition from politicians throughout Europe, the leftist media, and Democrats, all because he did what they wouldn’t dare do-tell the truth.