Donald Trump and his supporters have become all too familiar (almost immune) to many disturbing developments and trends throughout the 2016 Presidential election cycle. From Billy Kristol and Mitt Romney’s boisterous claims that Donald Trump would be a disaster as President, and that they of all people, could find someone better suited for the American people (despite the fact Donald Trump received millions of more votes then Mitt Romney when Romney was the Republican nominee in 2012, and that Billy Kristol is known for making comically false predictions as a political commentator), to the condescending and dismissive nature the mainstream media and politicians from both side of the isle have been treating Trump’s candidacy from the beginning while ignoring and overlooking the very real connection he’s been making with millions of American people, to the Mainstream Medias double standard in their treatment of the final two (for all intents and purposes) Presidential candidates, in that Donald Trump gets attacked for seemingly every decision he makes, while his rival candidate can do no harm (hold your jokes), to the common narrative or notion that anyone who agrees with Donald Trump and what he stands for is an “intolerant racist”, a “bigot” or a “hateful facist” while the accusers who make these bold and highly ignorant and insulting claims are never held accountable, we’ve just about seen it all. Now of course these are only a few of the disturbing trends Donald Trump and his supporters have taken note of, as they are seemingly endless, but perhaps the one i’m about to bring up is both the most fascinating and troubling.
Earlier this weekend, while working on my website, the website this current piece will be featured on- I was thinking of ways I could provide myself a consistent revenue for the material I provide for my visitors. While I certainly have a strong and deep rooted passion for what it is i’m doing with my website and would happily do it for free, it would simply be bad business to not attempt to profit off all the hard work and effort i’ve put into this project thus far (I can picture Donald Trump nodding his head in agreement with this statement). There of course is the subscription service route, where I would make my loyal following pay a monthly fee to be able to access my lengthy articles, and while i’m confident my articles are of high quality content and provide real value to my readers about the reality of politics and what’s really going on since the mainstream media refuses to tell both sides of the story, I strongly oppose this practice as I believe it is vitally important that anyone be able to access my material, as I simply do not want to limit my page views nor do I wan’t to force my loyal readers into paying for my information during these tough economic times.
Then of course there is the advertising option, where companies pay to have their advertisements on your website, and you then get paid for any clicks to their products and/or services from your page visitors. I am currently only using Amazon’s Affiliates program, which pays me anytime one of my page visitors clicks on one of the Amazon links I have provided on my site, and then decides to purchase a product on Amazon through the click they made. While the affiliates option is a great one for my political niche audience, as I can provide links to reading material that is highly relevant to the content I’m providing for my audience, I wanted to explore all avenues and ways to capitalize on all of my potential monetizing opportunities (Again Trump giving me the head nod in agreement).
In researching other potential monetizing opportunities, the one service I consistently saw pop up on my desktop was Google’s very own Google Adsense. After reading up on the service, and discussing it with colleagues and friends of mine, I decided to submit an application to use their service for my personal use. After making sure I followed up on all of their guidelines and designed a clean website with a layout eligible for ad usage, I typed in my website for the application approval, got the green check (many websites don’t even get this far, and instead get a “this URL is not eligible for our service”), filled out the rest of the application form and got the verification email that my website was currently under review. They said I would be receiving a notification of approval or rejection anywhere between the next 24 hours and a week. Not two hours had passed before I received the following statement from AdSense
“Thank you for your interest in Google AdSense. Unfortunately, after reviewing your application, we’re unable to accept you into AdSense at this time.
We did not approve your application for the reasons listed below.
Insufficient content: To be approved for AdSense and show relevant ads on your site, your pages need to have enough text on them for our specialists to review and for our crawler to be able to determine what your pages are about.
To resolve this issue, please work through the following suggestions:
- Make sure that your pages have sufficient text – websites that contain mostly images, videos or Flash animations will not be approved.
- Your content should contain complete sentences and paragraphs, not only headlines.
- Ensure that your website is fully built and launched before you apply for AdSense – do not apply while your site’s still in a beta or “under construction” phase or only consists of a website template.
- Place the ad code on a live page of your website. It does not have to be the main page, but test pages that are empty except for the AdSense ad code will not be approved.
- Provide a clear navigation system for your visitors so that they can easily find all of the sections and pages of your website.
Naturally I was frustrated and discouraged by the immediate rejection, but knew after doing research I was far from the first, and certainly wouldn’t be the last to have my website rejected by Google AdSense. However after reading the actual message and what it implied, I became more than dissatisfied with the extremely vague explanation for the rejection. “We did not approve your application for the reasons listed below. Insufficient content: To be approved for AdSense and show relevant ad’s on your site, your pages need to have enough context on them for our specialists to review and for our crawler to be able to determine what your pages are about”. Given the fact that my featured articles are anywhere between 3,000 and 10,000 words and that my message has been extremely consistent since the day the website was created (every single one of my loyal readers will tell you this) I had an extremely difficult time accepting the reasoning for my rejection. In fact- how anyone could read my website content and not understand my message that Donald Trump and his supporters are misunderstood due to constant media manipulation, and that our country is more concerned with political correctness than political truth in 2016, is beyond my comprehension. Not only that but all of my articles are throughly researched and backed up with statistics and facts, not generalizations and trivial points that lead to questionable conclusions. Totally unsatisfied with this response, I naturally sought out and demanded real answers and an actual explanation.
Silence the Truther
After researching contact information, I came across a number that was listed as the United States contact phone number for all Google AdSense related questions and concerns. However after making the phone call, I was informed by the gentleman that answered my call- this phone service was for Google Ad Words only, and that the best way for me to seek out answers regarding my AdSense rejection would be to contact the “AdSense Forum” where highly respected experts answer all questions and concerns regarding various AdSense accounts. Ah, so naturally Google, one of the biggest companies in the world, didn’t have a phone contact to hear my valid concerns, but could instead hide behind a computer keyboard in defense of their questionable decision and vague explanation for that decision.
Taking the very polite Google Employees suggestion, I created a message within the AdSense forum explaining my situation, and gave my web address information. I explained that my website was created in order to inform my viewers about the upcoming 2016 election and to change the narrative regarding Donald Trump and his supporters (since the mainstream media constantly lies about both subjects 24/7). This is the completely professional and unbiased response I got to my message less then 10 minutes after hitting the send button. Doctor No Way via the AdSense Help forum responded:
“Truth is in the eye of the beholder. What may be true to you is a total fabrication and fantasy to another person. Anything that’s controversial will cause anger to someone. That angry person could start an anti-you campaign that might involve clicking on your ads. It could be a high percentage of those visiting your site. That would generate a lot of invalid activity and that would lead to your account being disabled permanently. Since the first responsibility of AdSense is to protect their advertisers, “truth tellers” like you are simply bad for business. That’s probably why your site is being rejected. Nobody really cares what angle you take or why your “truth” is any truer or simply more lies than any other site. It’s just the type that ends up with a disabled account.
So really, what AdSense is doing by rejecting your application is protecting not only the advertisers from fraud but you from a future of a disabled AdSense account. That leaves you free to apply again. Who knows? Maybe you end up with a site about fluffy kittens and puppies which has actual commercial value and won’t generate a lot of invalid activity. When you apply with that site, you might get an account.I suggest you ask for donations from your other truther buddies and believers. Perhaps they will find your material enlightening and worthy of support.One additional comment. Since you’re giving your opinion, you should know that your opinion of political events has no commercial value. Nobody except perhaps your mother would care what you think about the events that happen in the political world. Everyone has two things that should be kept out of the public view: An opinion and an anus.Now if you were a world famous pundit who perhaps ran for president one cycle, you might have some name recognition (isn’t that why so many do it?) and that would give you not only a loyal following of fellow believers but also offers from news agencies to be a talking head. Perhaps you should try that in 2020.”
Now let’s take a step back and look at this from an objective standpoint (something this man certainly failed to do). It is true that political blogs can often be viewed as controversial, or “extreme” so to speak as many people don’t like to touch the subject, so businesses may view placing their advertisements on political websites as “bad business”. Perhaps this is the real reason my website was rejected for advertisements and not because of “insufficient content” like the company had originally explained. This was however the most juvenile and condescending message I have received from any liberal since creating my website over two months ago, and that’s saying something.
Regardless of the reasoning for the rejection, this much is indisputable- for this to be the only source of “help” I received with regard to my situation from a company as large as Google, is completely inexcusable and a horrible reflection on the not so tolerant, power abusing, global corporation that is known around the world as Google. The fact that it has been well over 24 hours since I received this “professional explanation” and only this explanation- is completely disturbing and disconcerting for those of us that have had valid concerns about Google all along- that is you’re not welcome if we don’t agree with your message, even if it’s the truth and we know it. Again it’s been well over 24 hours since I received this message, and not one person from Google has rectified this offensive and false explanation as to why my website was rejected, nor have they issued a statement saying something to the extent of “our company doesn’t necessarily reflect the thoughts of this poster”- nope, not a thing. Why? Because they agree with this liberal bully because Google is the ultimate liberal bully. This is what conservatives and Donald Trump supporters across the country have become accustomed to and learned throughout this Presidential election cycle -that is money, big companies and globalism control American politics, not the will of the American people. It’s also a reminder that in addition to having to fight the mainstream media and politicians from both sides of the aisle for the truth in politics, we also have to contend with powerful online companies like Google and Facebook.
Now remember this forum poster let me know that, “truth is in the eye of the beholder. What may be true to you, is a total fabrication and fantasy to another person”. Ah- making the claim that what I’m saying may be a total fabrication and fantasy to another person, without having to back up this claim (remind you of anything- Donald Trump’s a racist and so are his supporters- of course I don’t need proof or anything). So what exactly have I claimed in any of my articles that isn’t factually true? Is it that what I’m saying isn’t true, or is it that the truth hurts Google’s narrative and political agenda? I don’t think this question needs to seriously be answered. Did Hillary Clinton not accept anywhere between 10-25 Million dollars from Saudi Arabia? Did Hillary Clinton not lie about being given permission to put highly classified information on her private e-mail server? Did Hillary Clinton not openly support gay marriage until 2013? Did Hillary Clinton not receive $675,000 in speeches to Goldman Sachs alone and then refuse to release the transcripts from those speeches? Did Hillary Clinton not vote for the Iraq War? Is Hillary Clinton not currently being investigated by the FBI? (which would make her ineligible to run for District Attorney, but totally acceptable if you’re running for President). Of course every single article I have written has been well sourced, and been backed up by a plethora of facts and statistics, but this is irrelevant because it goes against the globalist Google agenda.
The forum poster went on to say (now remember- this is literally the only help provided by google for all AdSense related questions and concerns) “One additional comment. Since you’re giving your opinion, you should know that your opinion of political events has no commercial value. Nobody except perhaps your mother would care what you think about the events that happen in the political world”. This is a common liberal fascist, bullying tactic- resort to name calling and let the truth teller know his opinion is invalid and worthless because it diverts from the liberal agenda. Considering the fact that my most recent article entitled, Im Not with Her- Why Hillary Clinton as President Would be Disastrous for the United States of America has received over 2,500 retweets and received more page views than many blogs using AdSense get in a total month, while receiving comments such as “The most fair article I’ve ever read on Hillary & Obama. Truth is truth no matter how we try to gloss it up, Excellent journalism!”, and “This spells things out that even the most solid HRC supporter can’t even argue with”, and “Beautiful well sourced article on the ways of Crooked Hillary”, and “All facts. Must Read! Use your conscience!” and “After reading this article, I can honestly say this is the most accurate & detailed assessment I have ever seen” -just to name a few, and perhaps it becomes even more clear than ever that it’s not that my opinion that is invalid, it’s that I tell the truth about Hillary Clinton, the Presidential candidate Google has gone to extraordinary lengths to protect. In fact, out of the 100 plus comments I received in response to my Hillary Clinton article, only two claimed it to be false. When I politely asked them to point out one specific thing in my article that was false, they both became strangely silent. In fact, I challenge any Hillary Clinton supporter, or twitter user using the #imwither hashtag currently reading this, to read my article Im Not With Her- Why Hillary Clinton as President Would be Disastrous for the United States of America and point out one thing I claim that is false, just one- I wish you luck.
Google’s Psychological Manipulations
Heres what the American people need to know- Google doesn’t want your opinion to be heard if they disagree with it. Google also doesn’t want you to have easy access to information that could strongly influence your political opinions and beliefs and sway you to the right side of the aisle. Google is essentially Mark Zuckerberg on steroids-it is a powerful, well oiled machine that stomps on the truths regarding Donald Trump and the disturbing realities of Hillary Clinton. Google is a truth silencer and an enabler of globalists.
The experience I had certainly doesn’t help counter the common and popular belief Google censors anything that goes against Hillary Clinton. The lack of help I received and Google’s silence on the handling of the situation is just flat out indefensible and inexcusable. Here are some interesting things I learned about Google- the United States number one search engine.
Google, much like the Mainstream Media, is one of Hillary Clinton’s biggest supporters, allies, and political tools. Google has been quietly altering Google’s search recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton’s campaign for months. For those who don’t know- a google search recommendation is when you begin to type out your google search and the Google service automatically tries to guess the rest of your search for you, or recommends searches for you. For example, if I type in “Trump U” into my Google search engine right now, the results recommended are “Trump University Lawsuits”, “Trump University” , and then “Trump Upenn” (where Donald Trump attended school) as the third and final result. One could certainly claim this shows bias, as it would clearly influence the everyday person to potentially click on “Trump University Lawsuits” which would lead to a display of various articles regarding the lawsuits his University has received. Now if I type in the same exact thing on Google’s rival search engine Bing, and type in Trump U, the first three results are “Trump Update”, “Trump University”, and “Trump Univision” which mentions nothing about the Trump University lawsuits, a clear difference from the Google search results. What Google doesn’t want you to know– Donald Trump won a key legal battle regarding his Trump University lawsuits this past September, when a court in California rejected the claim made by six students, that “they were falsely lured into Mr. Trump’s University with no real hopes of recouping their educational investment” after some of the accusers had admitted to receiving at least some value from the courses- which lead the court to throw out the damages claim. In addition to this, 98 percent of all Trump University students have rated the program as excellent, and the Better Business Bureau rated the University an A. Good effort google. Lets take my personal detective work a step further- If I type out Trump University into Google’s search engine right now, I get ten results with the Trump University wikipedia page being at the top. The next nine are titled as follows-
- “Former Trump University Workers Call The School a Lie” -nytimes.com
- “Trump University- Yes It Was A Massive Scam”- National Review
- “Trump University- It’s Worse Than You Think”- The New Yorker
- “The Art of the Upsell: How Donald Trump Profits From ‘Free’ Seminars- The Atlantic (this also was written in 2014 but is the fourth article to show up- odd right?)
- “Donald Trump Trying to Suppress Video Depositions in Trump University Lawsuit- Gawker (read this- it’s comical)
- “Donald Trump billed his “University” as a road to riches, but critics call it a fraud” -The Washington Post (written in September before he won his lawsuit)
- “Trump University: The Presidential Candidate May Have Run a Scam” -National Review (Written in July of 2015, again before Trump won his lawsuit and developments (the truth) started to break his way)
- “What the Legal Battle Over Trump University Reveals About Its Founder” – Time
- “The 9 Wildest Complaints Against Trump University”- Mother Jones
Google also provides an “In the News” section in between the ten links they provided me after searching “Trump University” in their search engine. The three links are, “Donald Trump Is Struggling to Find Anyone to Speak at His Convention”- Vanity Fair , which was posted 5 hours ago, “Is Donald Trump Hurting Himself” – CNN, posted 2 hours ago, and finally, “We’re an Easy Target’ Taken in by the Trump Brand”- New York Times, which was posted 2 days ago. What’s missing? Not a single one of these links provided or mentioned anything remotely positive regarding Donald Trump, nor do they mention the fact that Donald Trump won a lawsuit in September after it was proven the accusers admitted to receiving “some value” from Trump University, nor does it mention the fact that 98 percent of Trump University students claimed their educational experience was “excellent”, nor the fact that the Better Business Bureau passed the school with flying colors, giving it an A grade- all three indisputable facts. I had to go out of my way to find this information as Google, the number one search engine in the world by far, actively hides this vitally important information.
Now the average voter who doesn’t do their political homework (which I hate to say is the majority of American people) would have absolutely no reason to believe anything positive regarding Trump University has occurred in the last 12 months (which of course it has), and anyone who is already against Trump would have their thoughts “confirmed” on the matter through Google, and those who are still unsure of who they are voting for in November could potentially be influenced by these blatant manipulations of the Google system.
Now if I type in “Hillary Clinton F” into a google search engine, I get the following results- “Hillary Clinton for President”, “Hilary Clinton Facts”, “Hillary Clinton Foreign Policy”, and “Hillary Clinton Funny”, what’s missing? Well considering the fact Hillary Clinton is currently under FBI investigation for putting highly classified information regarding the Benghazi, Libya situation where four of our citizens were killed on foreign soil, and then she lied about receiving permission to do as much, one could argue it’s awfully puzzling (or awfully convenient) that there is no mention of FBI on Google’s recommended search results. Now again for comparison, if I were to type “Hillary Clinton F” into Bing, I get “Hillary Clinton for President”, “Hillary Clinton FBI Investigation”, “Hillary Clinton Facebook”, “Hillary Clinton FBI Investigation update”. There are two mentions of the FBI investigation under the Bing search results, and again, zero mentions of Hillary’s FBI investigation under the google search.
Lets try another example- If I were to type in “Hillary Clinton Cri” into the google search engine results (thinking I would possibly get something about a criminal investigation), I would get “Hillary Clinton Crime Reform”, “Hillary Clinton Crisis” and “Hillary Clinton Crime Bill 1994”, not a mention of her current FBI criminal investigation. Now if I were to type in the same “Hillary Clinton Cri” into a Yahoo search engine, I would get “Hillary Clinton Criminal Charges”, “Hillary Clinton Crimes”, “Hillary Clinton Criminal”, “Hillary Clinton Criminal Record”, “Hillary Clinton Crimes List”, only mentions of searches related to her criminal investigation and criminal behavior- a much more accurate and honest result regarding the current Hillary Clinton situation involving her current FBI Criminal investigation.
Google Owns the Internet- and by Extension the American People
Lets now consider why this development is so important regarding the upcoming 2016 Presidential election and the possible ramifications it could have on the results of perhaps the most important election in the history of the United States, and definitely the most polarizing election in the history of the United States. Let’s look at the following statistics and figures regarding Google.
- Every 60 seconds or 1 minute, over 2 million searches are conducted using the Google search engine.
- Google gets over 100 billion monthly searches
- The number of web pages indexed to google is 60 trillion.
- Google is the worlds most visited website, even beating out Facebook
- On August 16, 2013, Google went down for only five total minutes and in that time, the global internet traffic dropped by a full 40 percent.
- Google has been acquiring an average of two companies a month since the fall of 2010.
- Just to illustrate how much more powerful Google is than all of the other search engines (including the ones used in earlier examples), YouTube is the second largest search engine in the world behind Google, and is and is bigger than Bing, Yahoo!, and Ask combined.
- Google handles over 2 Trillion searches per year, which is equal to approximately 270 searches per person on earth.
Lets now take a look at an excerpt from Rick Shenkman’s book, Political Animals, which examines why, as Americans, we make the political decisions we make. It throughly examines the psychology behind the decisions we make involving politics.
“Why don’t we at least try to make a rational assessment of our presidents? Why do we seemingly rely on images of little relevance to provide an answer? It’s because evolution teaches us to think quickly. In the life-and-death setting common in the world of hunter-gatherers, speed was of the essence in sizing up both people and situations. We couldn’t let anything get in the way of our making up our minds, not even an absence of facts. In circumstances where we lack facts- a common occurrence in the real world-we found other bases upon which to make a decision. The point was to act. Dillydallying could kill you. The legacy of this evolutionary inheritance is that today we leap to make decisions even when we don’t need to. Instead of waiting for facts we rush to judgement. Through in the modern world we are seldom called on to render a lightning-fast, life-or-death judgement involving a politician, that’s what we do. We can’t help ourselves. We are hardwired to think fast rather than to reflect at length. Fast thinking (also known as System 1), as the pioneering psychologist Daniel Kahneman points out, is easy. It doesn’t require us to dwell. It really doesn’t require us to think at all, at least as most people define thinking. That’s because it mostly happens in the unconscious, where most of our brain functioning takes place”.
This excerpt is essentially making the argument that as human beings, we don’t need a lot of information to make our political decisions, but the information we do seek out, we need quickly. Google delivers it’s information to it’s viewers in the blink of an eye (it takes Google .66 of a second to upload search results), which is exactly what the American people want. With the way our society is currently constructed, we demand information and expect it immediately. We live in an ADHD society, where we are all multitasking throughout the day, never allowing ourselves to truly absorb the information we are receiving. When you search Trump University as I did, and only see negative articles in relation to the topic, it has a massive psychological impact on how you now feel about that particular topic and the specific candidate it’s in relation to. Think about it- you search a specific topic, and immediately only see search web results consisting of links that slant the narrative a particular way (in this case clearly left), you are more than likely now to be persuaded that particular way. It is blatant psychological manipulation, and Google knows it.
When you consider these statistics, figures and thoughts- it is simply impossible to downplay the massive effect Google is having on the upcoming election, and how it’s calculated manipulation of search engine results, recommended searches, and display of articles regarding Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump, could help influence the outcome of who will lead our country for the next 4 to 8 years. It is literally intentionally increasing the chances of altering the perceptions of millions of Americans regarding the two Presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
So how is it possible that the number one online search engine could be so negligent in their search engine responses regarding the one and only Hillary Clinton? How is it that a company used by almost every single American, every single day for it’s web results, could so blatantly disregard their algorithms and rules when it comes to the former first lady and the first female Democratic Presidential nominee? Google would prefer for you to put your blinders on regarding the dark reality that is Hillary Clinton, never mind that- Google is literally voluntarily assisting you in putting your blinders over your eyes by intentionally misleading your search recommendations to paint Hillary Clinton in a brighter, borderline misleading light. Google just falls in a long line of the many corporations and companies, along with CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and much of the mainstream media in enabling Hillary Clinton to get to the point where she is now, potentially five months away from becoming the next President and first female President in United States history. Google is essentially telling the American people that a corrupt career politician, who’s currently under investigation by the FBI for lying about putting highly classified information on her private e-mail server, and has taken anywhere between 10-25 million dollars from a country that finds gay behavior punishable by death and beheads its citizens (which also happens to be the birthplace of Islam, the religion Hillary and Barack Obama have been pandering to, while lying to the American people about what this religion and it’s potential danger could mean for the American people) is the best option for the American people. If you disagree with this assessment it doesn’t matter and Google doesn’t care, because Google is more powerful than you are and they revel in this fact.
Eric Shmidt- The Chairman of Google
When you consider the fact that the chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt- created a start up company to run the digital component of Hillary Clinton’s campaign- this blatant bias and manipulation of the American people becomes far less surprising, but no less troublesome. The company named “Groundwork”, was created to “ensure Clinton had the engineering talent to win the election”. Again, here you have the Chairman of Google starting a company to make sure Clinton had all of the online advantages she needed to enhance her chances of winning the election. The chairman of the company that gets over 100 billion monthly searches, and on average 3.5 billion searches a day, and makes up for over 80 percent of the search engine market share, is 100 percent invested in making sure Hillary Clinton wins the upcoming Presidential election. This is the chairman of Google- which perhaps illustrates the epitome of political corruption better than anything else we’ve seen this election cycle.
Only 6 miles down the road from where the Google Offices are located in Mountain View California, resides a 32 year old Harvard graduate who is short in height, but large in stature and enormous in political influence and power. His name is Mark Zuckerberg, the creator of the social media platform Facebook- and he may just be the biggest enemy of the Trump movement, something he hasn’t exactly been tight lipped about. He also happens to be worth approximately $51.2 billion, and has complete control over the most powerful social connection tool in the world, which also happens to be the second most visited website in the world behind Google. He essentially has the authority and legal ability to tailor his company’s message as he sees fit- which is to say if you post information and/or links that go against his political beliefs and agenda, it’s not going to end well for you.
Zuckerberg’s Power Trip
A website that was originally designed for Ivy League students to connect with each other in hopes of improving their social lives and their odds of climbing the social ladder, has ballooned into an unrecognizable monster whose owner is barely holding onto the leash and loving every second of it. As undeniable as Zuckerberg’s intelligence and work ethic may be (he worked tirelessly in his Harvard dorm to put together what was originally known as “Facemash”) his ego and lack of relatability are equally undeniable. While he may be hyper confident in his business abilities (who wouldn’t be after creating Facebook and being worth billions of dollars), he is a socially awkward introvert who went from being rejected in the real world to being worth billions of dollars. Zuckerberg is quite literally one of the least relatable people on the planet, much like the female Presidential candidate he now protects. (To his credit and much like Trump he at least earned his money through hard work).
Zuckerberg and Facebook represent a smaller version of the global empire Google, but is far more ruthless and cold blooded about political censoring. Google is the silent killer that leaves little to no evidence behind (it took months for anyone to publicly acknowledge their censoring), whereas Facebook leaves a note after finishing off its kill as a way of receiving recognition for what it has done. Zuckerberg stomps on opinions that differ from his and then shouts it from the mountain top. He has essentially turned his baby Facebook into perhaps the closest thing to North Korea in our own country-a country that once prided itself on freedom of speech. Zuckerberg is representative of/has become the face of what so many conservatives throughout the country have become accustomed to during this current election cycle. That is, Democrats on the left are fully in favor of the second amendment (or the right to freedom of speech) until they don’t agree with the message. They will then do anything and everything within their power to suppress a differing opinion. Mark Zuckerberg actually has the power and ability to do just that, and many would argue he abuses his power.
What you need to know
Facebook has been colluding with the government to silence and censor the truth about Donald Trump, and dampen the frightening realities of Hillary Clinton’s past. They also actively suppress conservative news to alter the perception of their viewers regarding the Republican party and by extension Donald Trump… and anything positive that may be happening regarding either subject. In addition to this, they regularly remove posts that run counter to their political beliefs and liberal agenda, hiding behind the vague “We removed the following post below because it doesn’t follow the Facebook Community Standards”- a message that has become commonplace to all Trump supporters and conservatives who often do nothing more than express the truth about Trump and the political landscape.
Conservative Suppression
Earlier this summer, in early May, former Facebook employees admitted to routinely suppressing conservative news stories that Donald Trump supporters and Republicans throughout the country may have found of interest, by altering what appeared in the “Trending” news section as seen by millions of Facebook users daily. Stories that were organically trending and would have ordinarily appeared in the highly influential trending section had they pertained to any other subject of interest, were instead replaced by stories that Facebook “news curators” were instructed to artificially inject by those higher up the food chain at Facebook. It didn’t matter if the stories popularity didn’t warrant inclusion into the trending section, Zuckerberg and Co. were willing to break their own formulas and rules to erase the conservative news for far less popular stories. Not only that, but any story pertaining to Facebook itself which would have included Facebook’s own censoring of conservative news, was again replaced by less popular content that didn’t warrant inclusion. Facebook was literally “censoring their own censoring” in these instances, making their loyal visitors completely unaware of the corrupt behavior in which their company was taking part.
Amongst the topics that were given the axe were the Drudge Report, Chris Kyle- (the former Navy Seal who was murdered) and Steven Crowder. Crowder often goes on tour with Milo Yianippolous (the man I have often referred to as the flamboyant Donald Trump from the UK) to expose the double standards of liberals and to discuss how political correctness has become something which enables powerful people to get away with corruption and lies (much the same way Facebook and Google have been hiding behind political correctness as a means of suppressing free speech and vital political dialogue). The Drudge Report is a news service that covers Trump’s side honestly, something Facebook simply cannot stomach. One of the former curators claimed that the company would often force these “news choosers” to throw out a story if it came from a “red news source” (aka was conservative) and find the same story as provided by a “more neutral” source- which is to say if these “news curators” found a story from a source that wasn’t totally slanted left, it wasn’t “neutral” or “fair” in the eyes of Facebook. They were however, asked to artificially inject stories from CNN and The New York Times, two totally impartial and “neutral” news sources (heavy on sarcasm here).
If you censor information from sources such as the Drudge Report, a website designed to collect informative links filled with facts and highly useful information, one which actually tells the other side of the political story and tells the truth about Donald Trump and what he really represents, while censoring personalities such as Steven Crowder and Milo Yiannopoulos- two outspoken political personalities who routinely tell the truth about Trump and accurately call out personalities such as Zuckerberg for hindering free speech, then you are literally altering the political perceptions of millions of people. Lets take a look at the following statistics regarding Facebook, which illustrate how massive an impact they could be having on people’s political thoughts throughout the country (much like Google).
- Worldwide, there are over 1.65 Billion monthly active Facebook users, which is a 15 percent increase from 2015.
- 1.09 Billion people log onto Facebook daily as of March, 2016- a 16 percent increase from a year ago.
- There are currently over 222 million active Facebook users in the United States of America alone.
- One out of every five web paige views in the United States of America occur on Facebook.
- According to Pew Research, 61 percent of American millennials (those that were born between 1981-1996 for this study, which would include myself) rely on Facebook as their main source for their political news. Millennials alone make up for a quarter of the United States population.
- In that same study, they discovered that Baby Boomers, or those that are currently aged between 52-70, are the age group most interested in talking about politics, as 50 percent admitted to speaking about political topics at least multiple times a week. Out of this age group, over 40 percent rely on Facebook as their main source for political news.
- 51 percent of The Generation X of the American population, or those that are currently between 36-51 years old, said Facebook is their main source of political information and news.
- Both Millienials and Generation X use Facebook as their number one source for political news and information
When you look at the above statistics and figures regarding Facebook, you realize just how significant the potential political influence on the American people is. When you then consider the fact that Facebook has been routinely replacing news stories that are organically trending from sources such as the Drudge Report, Milo Yianppilous and other conservative news networks and publications, and replacing them with stories from sources such as CNN and the New York Times, (a television network that has been attacking Trump for seemingly every decision/statement he has made, and a paper that has already been exposed for blatantly lying about Trump’s treatment of woman)- the political effect on the American people is simply immeasurable. Zuckerberg is purposely eliminating news stories that could potentially be enlightening to a large portion of the American population about what Donald Trump really represents (and he knows it, because there isn’t a human on earth who’s more in control and on top of things regarding their company than Mark Zuckerberg) and replacing them with left leaning takes on political events that fit his bias and a liberal agenda and provide “confirmation bias” to those who have already made up their misinformed opinion of Donald Trump. Therefore articles which tell the truth about the illegal immigration problem and what allowing more Muslim refugees into the country could potentially mean for the safety and security of the American people- articles that include actual substance and indisputable facts that could alter the perception of many American voters- are not seen by millions of Americans every day because of Mark Zuckerberg. These articles do exist, you just have to do extra digging since Google intentionally makes them so difficult to find.
Don’t Tell the Truth
Perhaps the most troubling censorship development these past 12 months has been the defiant silencing of Facebook users who speak their minds if they differ from Zuckerberg. It is perhaps the most disturbing trend Trump and his supporters have faced in a long line of disconcerting realities concerning the lack of objectivity and fair treatment of the man they support for President.
Milo Yiannopoulos has often spoken about Facebook’s censorship of social conservative thoughts and the potentially dramatic ramifications it could have on the upcoming election. He has spoken as to why government colluding with Facebook in silencing opinions that differ from a globalist political agenda, is both dangerous and frightening for countries throughout the world and for the American people. When explaining why Facebook is the most dangerous censorship tool in preventing the expression of Donald Trump’s side of politics, and far more dangerous to other social media tools such as Twitter, Yiannopolous said the following:
“The other thing to bear in mind is that Facebook so far has a really really bad track record when it comes to free speech. And not just a bad track record censoring different political opinions like Twitter does. Facebook’s moves are even more sinister, in a way. Facebook has teamed up with governments to censor certain political opinions that the incumbent party doesn’t like. In Germany, for instance, Facebook has teamed up with Angela Merkel to censor reasonable, respectable, mainstream concern about mass Muslim immigration–or just about mass immigration in general–and has started removing this stuff and classifying it as “hate speech.” It is effectively slandering its own users saying that their perfectly reasonable points of view constitute “hate speech” and that they’re not going to be allowed on Facebook, and Facebook has promised the German government that this stuff will be removed within 24 hours. That is outright Orwellian. That is outright terrifying”.
Milo is essentially stating what so many conservative thinkers already know, which is you’re not allowed to speak to the problems regarding illegal immigration and the Muslim community on Facebook, even if it’s the truth. There have even been several instances where people have been denied the ability to defend Trump, regardless of whether it is completely rational, fair, and supported by facts.
Perhaps no one can speak to the points Milo just expressed, and to the overall biased treatment of Donald Trump supporters on Facebook, more so than Billy Kent (I changed the last name in the name of anonymity). Kent is a product manager and movie fanatic, who loves politics and the idea of freedom of speech. He also happens to be an African American from San Jose, CA, and an avid Donald Trump supporter.
The date was June 2, 2016, and it started off just like any other sunny California day. Just like millions of Donald Trump supporters throughout the country, Kent was beyond excited to see the man he had been inspired by speak in person, as Mr. Kent prepared to witness Mr. Trump’s speech at his rally in Kent’s hometown of San Jose later that evening. On his way to the rally, just before 6:30 PM, Kent was scrolling through his Facebook on his phone looking for updates on when he should expect the rally to begin. When scrolling through his newsfeed, he saw a post from the Verge’s Facebook page attacking Donald Trump. He then made the fatal mistake of defending Mr. Trump. “I replied to a post on The Verge’s FB page. The post was about a Donald Trump Toy where you have to try and locate his ‘Heart'”, Kent explained. The response he made to the petty but not unexpected post read as follows.
“NOTHING Trump has said is Racist. Illegal Immigration is a serious strain on this country, costing tens of billions of dollars per year. Here in San Jose, we have a DMV dedicated to helping illegals get a drivers license. Black crime is an epidemic that has consumed major cities across this country. With only a 13.5% total population, blacks commit a disproportionate amount of violent crimes. There is no institutionalist racism, only black peoples outrageous sense of aggrievement. AND Islam is the only so-called religion and political ideology that commands others to kill. 30K people died from Islamic terrorism around the world last year. We need to ban Muslims from entering this country UNTIL we have an effective screening policy. LIFE before religion and political ideologies”.
Once Billy had arrived to the San Jose Rally, approximately forty minutes or so after he made the above post, he went to login to his Facebook and was unable to do so. Instead he was greeted with the following
As seen above, Mr. Kent was temporarily blocked from posting, after letting his feelings be known in defense of Donald Trump. Perhaps the seemingly bewildering decision was just foreshadowing the wild night that was about to take place in San Jose. While Billy could have perhaps displayed his thoughts in a different manner (or a more politically correct manner) and phrased it differently, he was simply exercising his freedom of speech and telling the truth about the two topics Mr. Trump has made a huge part of his campaign and the two topics Mr. Zuckerberg seems to take most issue with… the illegal immigration and muslim refugee intake issues. Ironically later that night, at the rally at which Billy had just arrived, the reality that is the current illegal immigration problem in the United States of America hit Mr. Kent like a freight train and validated the exact points and concerns he had just made on Facebook, which was immediately taken down and had him banned from Facebook, as he witnessed first hand the deplorable behavior displayed by the anti-Trump protesters outside of the San Jose Convention Center.
While Zuckerberg and Co. were busy silencing the avid Trump supporter’s view of the current illegal immigration problem from their close knit, closed minded community just 21 miles down the road, Billy and his fellow Trump supporters were being physically and verbally assaulted by hundreds of Mexican flag waving anti-Trump protestors, who had waited for Billy and his fellow Trump admirers outside of the center like a swarm of bees. While Zuckerberg was placing his hand over Billy’s mouth for speaking the truth, Billy was witnessing… a Trump supporter innocently walking down the sidewalk after leaving the rally before getting hit over the side of the head with a bag of rocks, (which caused him to bleed profusely)… a female Trump supporter being verbally assaulted by hundreds of male protesters who shouted obscenities in Spanish before assaulting her with a barrage of eggs… gangs of anti-Trump protestors chasing down Trump supporters, stealing their signs and apparel before lighting it on fire… and Trump supporters being blocked off by the violent protesters in the parking lot, surrounding the supporters cars and preventing them from being able to leave the rally for a more safe and secure area. (For a more detailed and thorough experience of what Billy had to go through, read my article The Truth Behind San Jose and Trump). The only thing Billy was guilty of, was telling too much of the truth about a real issue many Americans are concerned about, the immigration problem in his city of San Jose.
You see, Billy had a very legitimate reason to express his displeasure with the way illegal immigration is being handled in his city. When you consider the fact that one out of every three residents in San Jose and its neighboring city of Santa Clara are immigrants, and that 50 percent of those immigrants are illegal immigrants, and that San Jose and Santa Clara have a higher immigrant percentage than both New York City and Los Angeles, and that Billy and other California residents are paying for these illegal immigrants through their hard earned tax dollars- it suggests that perhaps the anti-Trump protesters knew their free ride would soon be over and that this avid Trump supporter was rightfully expressing the reality of the illegal immigration problem he has experienced first hand. In case you are wondering why the anti-Trump protestors were able to seemingly attack the loyal supporters with no consequences, it was because they were. Knowing these facts and statistics, the Mayor of San Jose, Sam Liccardo, knew things could get a little out of hand- not because Mr. Trump is a hate filled, intolerant racist of course- but because he wasn’t addressing the illegal immigration problem in his own city, and therefore demanded his police department stand down, altering the perception of the events that took place that night. Zuckerberg certainly knows of these figures as well, being that his Facebook office is just down the road. The creator of Facebook wanted to dampen the reality of the illegal immigration problem in San Jose, and by extension protect Sam Liccardo and Hillary Clinton. Billy’s truth couldn’t be known, and Zuckerberg and Facebook knew it.
Lauren Southern can certainly relate to Billy’s experience, after Facebook disarmed her right of free speech for simply speaking her mind and telling the truth about Donald Trump’s Muslim stance. Southern is an outspoken conservative, with a wealth of knowledge concerning foreign affairs and the potential terrorist threats we face as a nation- perhaps too much for Mr. Zuckerberg’s liking. When explaining Mr. Trump’s proposed temporary Muslim ban in an effort to inform her misguided Facebook audience, she stated the following:
“Donald Trump is not anti Muslim. He is anti Isis. What Trump is trying to say is that Homeland Security can not differentiate which Muslim is radical wanting to cause harm, and which is a harmless refugee. This is why nothing gets done. We are too busy being politically correct . Who is willing to sacrifice their family’s safety for the sake of political correctness? Are you? #Trump2016.”
Perhaps there is no better example to shed light on the absurdity of Zuckerberg’s truth censoring of Trump supporters and conservatives throughout the country than what followed this completely fair, well thought out/rational post. There was nothing about this thought that was hateful, racist, bigoted, ignorant, or even controversial. Lauren was simply explaining what Donald Trump’s temporary Muslim ban is actually about, and clarifying that the rationale behind this policy proposal is not Trump’s intolerance or hatred for Muslims (as Mr. Zuckerberg would like you and your Facebook friends to believe) but rather his concern that so many of these Muslim refugees who are entering, are doing so with no form of reliable identification, making it simply impossible to ensure we don’t unknowingly allow some Muslims into our country who have ties with terrorist groups such as ISIS or any radical group.
Lauren’s reward for simply speaking the truth was a 30 day ban. Perhaps Zuckerberg and Facebook realized Ms. Southern knew what she was talking about and would be able to enlighten the Facebook community on foreign policy and the potential Muslim and Isis threats, which would alter the audience’s perception of Trump’s temporary ban- again something Facebook can’t allow.
When you consider the fact that two of the main voting-eligible age groups in the United States of America (the millennial’s and the generation X) use Facebook before anything else for their political news and information, and then consider the fact that rational and informative political opinions, such as Ms. Southern’s stance on the Muslim and the ISIS issue, (an informative post that could have dramatically altered the perception of her Facebook audience and perhaps influenced them to think differently about Donald Trump and why he’s really temporarily banning Muslims)- are constantly being taken down, in addition to stories and findings from sources such as the Drudge Report, Steven Crowder, etc, that consist of pointing out hypocrisies from the left side, and tell the truth about Donald Trump, and have them being replaced by undeserving stories from sources such as CNN and the New York Times (two very liberal sources) the ramifications and effects it has on this upcoming presidential election cycle are again- simply immeasurable. Mark Zuckerberg and his loyal, bullying and free speech hating worshipers are intentionally blinding you from the truth, the truth that hurts their political agenda, by consistently deleting posts that rightfully bring up real American issues, and defend Donald Trump and what he really represents, and in doing so alter millions of peoples minds towards Trump.
The Clooney Disconnect
With his hand pressed up against his right cheek, and his elbow slouched on the table in front of him, seated next to his co-star Julia Roberts in a promotional effort for their upcoming movie Money Monster Cannes, George Clooney made the following remark:
“There’s not gonna be a President Donald Trump, umm that’s not gonna happen, and it’s not gonna happen because we’re not gonna, fear is not gonna be something that were gonna, um, that’s gonna be, what drives our country. We’re not gonna be scared of Muslims, or or Immigrants, or you know- women, we’re not actually afraid of anything”.
Ah we’ve seen this script before- like Zuckerberg, George Clooney has been going on a bad mouthing tour of Donald Trump the past several months, while hiding behind the comfort of $180 million-something 99.9 percent of the United States of America can’t relate to, which disqualifies him from understanding the real struggles Donald Trump supporters are facing. Like Zuckerberg, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama- George Clooney continues to hide behind political correctness while conveniently leaving out the facts regarding the real problems attendant to illegal immigration and Muslim refugee intake in this country. Clooney, like his other powerfully disconnected liberal associates, continues to irresponsibly distort what Donald Trump is really talking about when speaking to illegal immigration issues and the Islamic religion (among many other topics) by instead making it a morality issue, unoriginally suggesting Trump brings up such topics out of fear and irrational racism and hate mongering, rather than the real reason he has been suggesting such policies-which is to place the American people’s best interests first by doing what he believes is best in ensuring their safety.
This is something conservatives have seen from the Democratic playbook since the day Trump entered the race this time last year- to purposefully blind people from seeing the real valid points Donald Trump brings to the table, while shifting the focus to issues of morality. Of course for him to even bring women into the equation as a way of suggesting Trump is sexist and/or a woman hater is wholly irresponsible and misleading. Perhaps Clooney has been getting his political information and news from Zuckerberg’s Facebook which loves posting New York Times stories.
It isn’t particularly surprising that the rhetoric coming from the A list actor sounds eerily similar to that of the current Democratic Presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton-considering the fact Mr. Clooney has routinely held fundraisers for Mrs. Clinton’s campaign. Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton’s main competitor on the Democratic side of the race, has been very outspoken on this particular topic and has claimed this type of behavior is just more proof that money, not policy or conviction on the issues wins elections. The vast majority of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders supporters would wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Sanders assessment, and Zuckerberg, Clooney, and Google are just more evidence that this line of thinking is spot on. “One of the great tragedies is that big money is winning elections” Sanders has stated on numerous occasions during his campaign tour. When Clooney was asked about these comments from Mr. Sanders while fielding an interview from Chuck Todd, he agreed-despite admitting that guests who attended his fundraisers had to pay $353,000 to attend- yes $353,000 per couple just to attend and be a “co-chair” for the event. This money again was raised for Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.
Perhaps there is no one person, more guilty of the “Clooney disconnect” than the man whose been ordering those beneath him to silence political opinions that differ from his and shed light on the truth in politics. Just a few days earlier in San Francisco, before Clooney was fumbling on his contradicting words regarding corruption in politics, Mark Zuckerberg was delivering his keynote address at his F8 Facebook Developer Conference. Sporting the infamous grey t-shirt he’s known for always wearing, Zuckerberg let his feelings on Donald Trump and his plans to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the country, and securing our border to make illegal immigrants have a more difficult time from entering the country be known. While feverishly pacing back in forth in front of his cult following of Conservative hating employees and sponsors, Zuckerberg stated the following,
“I hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as others, for blocking free expression, for slowing immigration, reducing trade”.
Mark Zuckerberg- much like the Democratic Presidential nominee he strongly supports, plays the moral superiority card, letting us all know how caring and empathetic he is, while hiding behind the comfort of billions of dollars and walls- yes walls. You see, when he’s not too busy dismissing Donald Trump and his millions of supporters, or actively suppressing and silencing their fair and factual opinions and concerns, he’s overseeing the wall that is currently being built around his vacation home in Kauai, Hawaii. Isn’t it close minded of you to be building a wall Mark? Perhaps practice what you preach? Ironically much like Mr. Clooney, Zuckerberg apparently yearns for and craves the maximum amount of privacy. Zuckerberg’s neighbors are extremely upset about the situation, claiming the wall is a complete eyesore, as it allegedly blocks off a scenic view of their beloved ocean, suggesting that perhaps Zuckerberg isn’t as eco-friendly as he would like for all of the “intolerant” Trump supporters to believe he is.
Perhaps Zuckerberg and Clooney could provide the refugees they claim to be so compassionate and caring about about a place to reside. Maybe you guys could put a good amount of them in one of Clooney’s five multimillion dollar mansions, or create a “safe space” for them on Zuckerberg’s 700 acres of property in Hawaii. Zuckerberg also mentioned how his company is based on “connecting the people” and criticized Trump, implying Trump’s rhetoric while out on the campaign tour, is “blocking free expression” and “distancing people they label as others”. Perhaps Zuckerberg should take a look in the mirror since that’s exactly what he’s been doing to a large portion of the American people who think differently then he does. He is quite literally distancing his company from any association with the alternative political views by silencing valid concerns from Trump supporters across the country, and ordering his “news curators” to replace organically trending news stories that could shed the truth on Trump- the real truth, by having them instead be replaced by sources that reinforce his narrative and stroke his ego.
Cover Your Eyes Mark, Hillary, Barack, Mr. Schmidt, and Mr. Clooney- Here Comes the Reality.
Since Mark Zuckerberg, George Clooney, Hillary Clinton, Google, and Barack Obama refuse to tell the American people about the truth regarding the Muslim community and what the potential dangers of allowing thousands of Syrian refugees into the country could mean for the American people, and continue to lie to the American people about the illegal immigration problem in the United States of America, and instead chalk it up to “ignorance and intolerance” on Mr. Trumps end like Mrs. Clinton has been doing every week since Donald Trump was seen as a clear threat to her presidency, I will. Here are some statistics and facts Mr. Obama, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Zuckerberg, Google and George Clooney don’t want you to know, and do their damnedest to prevent you from finding, or freely expressing and displaying.
Trump Reality
Since Hillary Clinton, the creator of Facebook, and Mr. Clooney continue to vaguely and irresponsibly bring up the term “immigration” as a way of suggesting Mr. Trump hates all immigrants, or is referring to just simply any old immigrant when bringing up his polices and stances, let me clear up what it is Mr. Trump is really suggesting with his “immigration” policies. Mr. Trump has always been referring to illegal immigrants only, and implementing policies that will make it more difficult for them to enter the country, something they’re doing astonishingly easily currently, at an excessive rate. Mr. Kent from San Jose is nodding his head in agreement while reading this. The following facts regarding the reality of illegal immigration, the facts Zuckerberg and Google don’t want you to know about, will be more proof Mr. Trump is correct in his assessment that our border is anything but secure, and that illegal immigrants are a major burden on the American people currently.
When it comes to the Muslim issue, Mr. Trump simply wants to put a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country until we can implement a more safe and secure system to ensure the American people’s safety, and not unknowingly allow Muslims refugees with ties to terrorism and ISIS into the country. Mr. Trump does not hate Muslim people, not at all, not close. He does however, want to protect the American people from unnecessary danger regarding terrorism, whereas Mark and Hillary lie to you about the facts out of political correctness.
Hillary Reality
- Hillary Clinton- the woman who has been endorsed by current President Mr. Barack Obama, and supported by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg, the woman George Clooney has held numerous fundraising events for, and Eric Schmidt, the Chairman of Google has gone to great lengths to protect and distort her frightening reality, is still currently under federal investigation by the FBI.
- Over a month ago, the inspector generals office at the state department disagreed with Mrs. Clinton’s claims that she was given permission to put highly classified information on her personal e-mail server, and filed a report that came to the conclusion Hillary Clinton did indeed violate the federal records act, by not turning over all official e-mails before she left office as Secretary of State under Obama. Not only that, but there was zero evidence Mrs. Clinton even requested for, or received approval to use her personal account for official business, contrary to what Clinton had been telling everyone for months.
- Hillary Clinton has taken anywhere between 10-25 million dollars from Saudi Arabia. The same Saudi Arabia that ranks 134th out of 145 countries in the Global Gender Gap Index. The same Saudi Arabia, that doesn’t allow women to walk around in public without a male chaperone by their side, it’s the only country in the world where females aren’t allowed to drive, and only 15 percent of females work outside of their homes. I thought Trump was the woman hater Clooney, isn’t that what the New York Times told you?
- It’s the same Saudi Arabia that sometimes finds gay behavior punishable by death, and it’s the same Saudi Arabia that beheads its citizens in front of crowds still- today.
Muslim/Refugee/ISIS Reality
- In a Gallup poll that was recently done in the UK, 1001 Muslims were asked if they believe homosexuality was moral or acceptable. Zero responded yes- which is strong evidence, it is impossible to please and pander to both the LGBT and Muslim community like Mrs. Clinton is currently attempting to do.
- Just earlier this week, a horrible terrorist attack took place in Istanbul, Turkey, at the Istanbul airport. It tragically took the innocent lives of 44 people (number unfortunately will likely continue to climb). The suicide bombers/killers were of course Muslim refugees from Syria who were connected to the highly dangerous terrorist group ISIS.
- Turkey also happens to be the country with the highest amount of Syrian Refugees, with a total of over 2.7 million currently, more than a million more than any other country in the world. I think it’s safe to say the majority of Turkish residents don’t find Trump’s temporary ban on Muslims entering the country until we can implement a more safe and secure system as “intolerant and racist” but rather safe and smart.
- The Orlando Killer that senselessly took the lives of 50 people at the gay nightclub Pulse, was a Muslim born to Afghan parents.
- In Afghanistan, where the father of the Orlando killer was from and ran for President- 39 percent of Muslims find suicide bombings sometimes justifiable.
- 25 Percent of Muslims in Turkey (where suicide bombings just killed 44 people) find suicide bombings sometimes justifiable.
- ISIS has claimed responsibility for the last two terrorist tragedies in Orlando and Istanbul, Turkey.
- At least six of the killers in the Paris Attack tragedy that took the lives of 130 people, were Syrian Muslim refugees.
- 21 Percent of Syrian Muslim residents support or have positive thoughts about ISIS
- Hillary Clinton would implement a Syrian and Muslim refugee intake system similar to Barack Obamas, with one major difference. Obama currently want’s to have 10,000 Syrian refugees come over to America before the end of the federal budget year (or end of September). Hillary wants to increase this by 500 percent, which would equate to approximately 65,000 Syrian refugees a year if Hillary Clinton were to become President, with no new safer screening plans. Given the stat just above this, it is certainly difficult to comprehend how she believes this could be for the betterment of the country and in the best interests of the American people.
- Allowing 65,000 Syrian refugees into the country a year, while knowing many of the refugees coming in have no form of identity, making it impossible in many instances to ensure they’re not Muslims connected to radical Islamic terrorist groups, coming to cause harm to the American people like Ms. Summer fairly and rationally suggested in her Facebook post (that was immediately taken down) and knowing over 1 in every 5 of these Muslim refugees have positive thoughts about ISIS, is simply insane.
- Remember however, Mr. Zuckerberg, Mr. Schmidt, Mr. Clooney, and Mrs. Clinton want you to know that this is what’s best for the American people.
The Illegal Immigration Reality (Zuckerberg isn’t gonna like this one)
- Remember the Billy Kent story I brought up earlier? In his state of California, they spent over $23.5 billion alone on illegal immigrants in 2014. That is hard earned money, being spent on people that broke our American laws and our now being gifted government handouts and assistance such as disability, public housing,EBT cards etc. They are essentially being rewarded for breaking the laws of this country.
- According to the Washington Times, as of 2014, three out of every four federal drug crimes were committed by illegal immigrants. Proving that perhaps Mr. Trump is 100 percent correct about the problem that is Illegals bringing in drugs into our country (he is).
- The number of people prosecuted for coming into the country illegally after being deported has increased by over 175 percent since 2005.
- The illegals that are coming into this country are accomplishing it fairly easily, suggesting that our border is far from secure. According to The United Nations, 97 percent of illegal immigrants who enter the United States secretly- do so across the nearly 2,000 mile Mexican border, but only 20 percent of those who cross illegally are caught.
- Kate Steinle was an innocent, happy 32 year old before she was senselessly murdered on the San Francisco pier last summer by Juan Francisco Sanchez. Random murders happen all the time in this country unfortunately, but Steinle’s killer was an illegal immigrant who had been deported from the country and came back five different times before committing the tragic crime.
- Just earlier this week, Bonifacio Oseguera-Gonzalez murdered three people on a blueberry farm in Oregon. Again, senseless murders occur all too often in the United States, however Oserguera-Gonzalez was an illegal immigrant who had been deported from the United States and came back six times since 2003. More proof that Mr. Trump is correct in his assessment that the U.S. border is currently far from secure, and is simply not getting the job done.
The UK Reality
- Just last week, the people of the UK voted to exit the European Union for several reasons, not the least of which was concern over continued immigration of Muslim refugees. This was a significant decision that suggested perhaps the UK doesn’t find Mr. Trump’s stance on illegal immigration or plan to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the country until there’s a more safe and secure screening plan implemented to prevent terrorists from unknowingly entering the U.S. and causing harm all that unreasonable either, but instead a plan that puts the American peoples best interest first. The UK essentially echoed Mr. Trump’s plead to take their country back, suggesting they’ve seen enough of the Muslim refugee takeover.
CONCLUSION
Just like so many politicians and political news personalities and pundits throughout America, Facebook and Google lack self awareness. They are blinded by their overinflated egos/sense of entitlement and their total disconnect from the reality that is the struggle of the everyday American- which leads to a total disregard for anyone who thinks differently than they do. The mainstream media’s constant badgering of Trump on seemingly any and every decision he makes, combined with two extremely powerful internet tools suppressing opinions in defense of Donald Trump, and factual information regarding his rival candidate Hillary Clinton, make it glaringly obvious and frighteningly clear that there are many powers pushing the corrupt force that is Hillary Clinton, and dismissing the American hope that is Donald Trump. You poked the bear, the bear that is millions of Americans across the country and it wasn’t a good idea-for we’re not going anywhere. As a result of my troubling Google AdSense experience, I immediately contributed $100 to the Donald J. Trump for President campaign, as did two of my friends after telling them of my disconcerting experience.
While this article surely won’t get the number of views that I would like for it to receive and honestly believe it deserves in my humble opinion- this alone will not stop me from continuing to tell the truth and informing the American people of just how corrupt politics in America has become. As I mentioned before and as Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump supporters know all too well- it is money, big corporations/companies and globalism that control politics, not the will of the American people. However as hard as George Clooney, Facebook, Zuckerberg, Google, and Saudi Arabian money receiving Hillary Clinton attempt to suppress vital information and opinions that deserve to be heard, it will continue to backfire- For again, you poked the bear, and it really wasn’t a good idea.
